校园英语杂志社
校园英语杂志论文投稿方式

关于我们

《校园英语》杂志是经国家新闻出版总署批准,由河北出版传媒集团主管,河北阅读传媒有限责任公司主办的,省级G4纯教育,英语类专业刊物。

校园英语杂志所发表论文已被《中国知网》、《龙源期刊网》全文收录。

国际标准连续出版物号:ISSN 1009-6426 国内统一连续出版物号:CN 13-1298/G4 邮发代号: 18-116

校园英语论文投稿邮箱:bianji@xyyybjb.com

校园英语杂志社唯一网站:www.xyyybjb.com

热门阅读

当前位置:校园英语杂志社 > 优秀论文 > 正文

作者:Wenxiao Li
  It is admitted that teacher-student interaction plays a significant role in improving teaching quality and triggering students’ interests in an EFL class. According to Long and Sato (1983), the most appealing approach to start a teacher-student interaction is questioning. In terms of China, questioning is used even more frequently than in other parts of the world (Zheng, 1997). Under this circumstance, I conducted a secondary classroom-research with the regard of the questioning, To be more specific, I intends to study the efficiency of question type on teacher-student interactions in EFL classrooms and draw a conclusion through analyzing students’ responses to different types of questioning.
  Before I move to the major findings of my mini research, there are several previous research and relevant theories that I would like to point out. Firstly, according to Ur (1996),, there were six factors that should be considered when evaluating the efficiency of a question: clarity, learning value, interest, availability, extension and teacher reaction. It is believed that through analyzing students’ responses from the six aspects scholars were supposed to test the quality of students’ answers. Based on Ur’s (1996) framework, Hu (2007) reinforces the consideration from students’ perspective, which, to be more specific, is students’ input and output during the questioning. Hu (2007) evaluated students’ responses based on students’ preparing time and students’ talking time, reflecting students’ language input and output respectively. Based on the theories and opinions mentioned above, this mini research would analyze the effect of teachers’ question from Six factors proposed by Ur (1996). During the analysis, besides the interactional analysis of teacher-student interaction in the questioning, C-unit is used as major measurement of students’ output. C-unit, according to Forster (1998), refers to a kind of meaning unit in talks which could be a word, a phrase or a sentence. The reason why C-unit is involved lies in the frequency of the elliptical sentences using in teacher-student interactions. Those elliptical sentences are not complete sentence but serve as a more natural way to express one’s opinion. Therefore, according to Forster (1998), it would be better to use C-unit to measure language output under such condition.
  The data used in this research are from six videos from the SELEP National Foreign Language Teaching Contest. Six English teachers’ classes were chosen from 174 teachers who participated in the final match of the SFLEP National Foreign Language Teaching Contest were selected to be participants. Factors like gender, award, background and teaching content were taken into consideration when the teachers were selected. Because of the requirements of the contest, every class was about 20 minutes and had 15 students participating in there. To make data comparable, the six participants were chosen from three groups: English Literature, Business English and Comprehensive English, which means there were two teachers from each group respectively.

相关阅读: